An İstanbul court during the fourth hearing on Monday handed down verdicts to 18 Turkish journalists and media employees in a trial concerning Feza Gazetecilik and the Cihan Media Distribution Co., sentencing 10 of them to prison.
The İstanbul 13th High Criminal Court, which convenes on the campus of Silivri Prison, sentenced Cihan news agency executives Hakan Taşdelen, Ahmet Metin Sekizkardeş and Faruk Akkan, general director of the Cihan news agency, to nine years in prison and a continuation of their imprisonment while the case is on appeal.
The court has also given seven years, six months in prison to Cihan news agency employees Osman Nuri Arslan, Ahmet İrem and Yüksel Durgut and decided for a continuation of their release under judicial supervision.
The same court sentenced Cuma Kaya, Alaattin Güner, Hüseyin Turan to four years in prison and Murat Avcıoğlu to three years, one month and 15 days and ruled to release them on their own recognizance.
The İstanbul court decided on the acquittal of Zafer Özsoy, Hüseyin Belli, Onur Kutlu, İsmail Küçük and Ali Hüseyin Çelebi on the charge of membership in a terrorist organization and ruled to release all of them from prison.
The court ruled to separate the files of Şeref Yılmaz, Osman Nuri Öztürk and Süleyman Sargın, the general director of Irmak TV, from the case, while it acquitted all other defendants of the charge of involvement in a coup attempt.
The trial of Zaman newspaper employees and columnists Ali Bulaç, İbrahim Karayeğen, Mümtazer Türköne, Şahin Alpay, Mehmet Özdemir, Mustafa Ünal, Ahmet Turan Alkan, Nuriye Ural, İhsan Duran Dağı, Lalezar Sarıibrahimoğlu and Orhan Kemal Cengiz will start on May 10 at İstanbul’s Çağlayan Courthouse.
An İstanbul prosecutor has demanded aggravated life sentences for nine journalists in the trial of employees of the former Zaman daily, which was closed by the government for its alleged affiliation with the Gülen movement.
There are 31 defendants in the indictment, 17 of whom are jailed. Mümtaz’er Türköne, Ali Bulaç, Ahmet Metin Sekizkardeş, Ahmet Turan Alkan, Alaattin Güner, Cuma Kaya, Faruk Akkan, Hakan Taşdelen, Hüseyin Turan, İbrahim Karayeğen, Mehmet Özdemir, Murat Avcıoğlu, Mustafa Ünal, Sedat Yetişkin, Şeref Yılmaz, Yüksel Durgut and Zafer Özsoy have been in pretrial detention for almost 19 months.
Eight defendants who were earlier released are Şahin Alpay, İhsan Dağı, Orhan Kemal Cengiz, Nuriye Akman, Lale Kemal, Onur Kutlu, İsmail Küçük and Hüseyin Belli. The remaining journalists are being tried in absentia.
Feza Gazetecilik owned the then-best selling Zaman daily, which was seized by the Turkish government on March 4, 2016 and closed down in the aftermath of a controversial coup attempt on July 15, 2016.
According to the prosecutor’s legal opinion, the nine prominent journalists, including Mümtaz’er Türköne, Ali Bulaç and Şahin Alpay, “violated the constitution.” In addition, the prosecutor demanded up to 15 years for each of the nine on charges of “membership in an armed organization.”
Other defendants for whom the same sentence was demanded are İbrahim Karayeğen, Mehmet Özdemir, Mustafa Ünal, Ahmet Turan Alkan, İhsan Duran Dağı and Orhan Kemal Cengiz.
For the 20 other defendants whose verdicts were handed down on Monday, the prosecutor demanded jail sentences of between seven and 15 years at the most recent hearing. Those charges included “membership in an armed organization” and “aiding the organization without being a member of it.”
The court is expected to announce its decision for the columnists and journalists on May 11.
The only evidence cited in the indictment as proof of “terrorism” and “coup plotting” are the published articles and op-ed pieces for some of the defendants, and serving as administrators for the newspaper for others.
Articles that commented on major graft investigations that were made public Dec. 17-25, 2013 and that implicated Erdoğan, his family members and his political and business associates were included in the indictment as criminal evidence and somehow linked to the July 15, 2016 coup attempt.
Ironically, the prosecutor himself said earlier that the articles themselves did not carry any element of crime, yet when considered collectively they must be construed as aiming to overthrow the government.








